I kept thinking about the assignment my freshmen were
working on in my absence: a project I’ve done many times. It’s called the Short
Story Seminar. Students essentially become the teachers and present a lesson on
an author and story from the unit. Over the years I continually tweak the
assignment and add and subtract elements. I’m proud of the fact that I’ve been
able to see the quality of the projects improve over the years as I revise the
rubric, and present both a sample “what to do” presentation of my own and a “what not to do” version.
But as I listened to the very first full group presentation,
it hit me: why did all of the projects have to take the same form?
Why couldn’t students who were kinesthetic learners add an
element of movement—a skit or movie? Why couldn’t a musically inclined student
include music as a part of his or her project?
Our first session was with Kathleen Malanowski and Tanya
Lynch, who are the division heads for NBP’s lower school. But even though I
teach high school, I can definitely see possible applications for my students.
The NBP team use both Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences and Costa and
Kallick’s Sixteen Habits of Mind as resources. They ask students to self
reflect and set their own learning goals.
Overall, they shared, you can use these various categories
of learning to offer a menu of options for activities and assessment.
They also suggested that at some points you can and should ask students to work in the areas have been avoiding because these are weak areas they need to develop. This idea was particularly intriguing for me, as one of my standard objections to the idea of always personalizing learning is that the “real world” often won’t allow us to tailor our choices or work to fit what we do best (often, in fact quite the opposite happens and we must find a way to make our skills fit in with what’s already in place).
They also suggested that at some points you can and should ask students to work in the areas have been avoiding because these are weak areas they need to develop. This idea was particularly intriguing for me, as one of my standard objections to the idea of always personalizing learning is that the “real world” often won’t allow us to tailor our choices or work to fit what we do best (often, in fact quite the opposite happens and we must find a way to make our skills fit in with what’s already in place).
But, while students are learning new concepts and skills, it
may be a very good idea to—at least sometimes—allow them to process the
information in the ways they feel most comfortable.
For my part, I’m definitely going to put a menu in place for
my next project. After all, I don’t like a banquet with just one or two choices—I
like to pick for myself. ;)
No comments:
Post a Comment